Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study is unique with regard to the availability of epidemiological and clinical data in an area of relatively pure dioxin exposure. The study indicates no statistically significant increase of incident pituitary tumors in this area, although the tendency toward a higher risk (three cases in zones A and B) of pituitary tumors in subjects exposed to high-intermediate dioxin concentrations in comparison with nonexposed population suggests the need for extended follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pesatori et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: