Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structured review analyzes the convergence of technologies for electrical system maintenance, suggesting improvements in integration and data governance.
The current literature on electrical system maintenance highlights three technology domains—building information modeling (BIM), Digital Twin (DT), and extended reality (XR)—that have independently demonstrated strong potential for improving lifecycle information management, predictive analytics, and operational support. However, their convergence remains largely underexplored, particularly in electrical system maintenance. This paper provides a structured review of BIM–DT–XR convergence in electrical system lifecycle management, examining their roles across lifecycle phases and their integration through literature synthesis and cross-domain implementation evidence. BIM is analyzed as a basis for modeling and integrating facility management with electrical asset lifecycles; DT as a framework for dynamic system representation and applications in electrical and power systems; and XR as a means of visualizing and interacting with BIM-DT environments. Cross-domain implementation evidence from an industrial electrical facility and a tertiary smart-building pilot shows that BIM–DT–XR integration is technically feasible at pilot scale. However, the analysis identifies five structural integration gaps: semantic misalignment between building-oriented IFC and grid-oriented CIM ontologies; fragmented standard adoption; inconsistent data governance and naming practices; validation approaches focused on syntactic rather than dynamic model fidelity; and the separation of XR visualization from predictive DT capabilities. The implementation evidence further indicates that real-world deployment remains constrained by data quality limitations, integration complexity, cost factors, and interoperability with legacy systems. The review concludes that, despite the maturity of individual technologies, their effective application depends on advances in semantic alignment, lifecycle data governance, validation of dynamic models, and scalable integration frameworks, enabling the transition toward integrated, interoperable, and lifecycle-aware infrastructures for electrical system maintenance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: