Key result
Nebivolol-induced pulse reduction ≥10 beats/min linked to ~3 mmHg greater drop in systolic BP.
Why the study?
The impact of baseline pulse rate and posttreatment pulse rate reduction on blood pressure-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in hypertension was unclear.
Does posttreatment pulse rate reduction or baseline pulse rate indicate the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension?
Cohort (n=3,011)
Does posttreatment pulse rate reduction or baseline pulse rate indicate the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The blood pressure-lowering efficacy of nebivolol is indicated by posttreatment pulse rate reduction rather than baseline pulse rate.
Background: This subanalysis of BENEFIT-KOREA cohort assessed the impact of baseline pulse rate (PR) and posttreatment PR reduction on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension.Methods: South Korean patients with hypertension were enrolled in the BENEFIT-KOREA study; 3,011 patients received nebivolol as monotherapy/add-on therapy.Time-averaged BP, calculated by sum of the product of BPs at weeks 12 and 24 corrected for number of participants at these timepoints, was evaluated with/without adjustment for baseline BP.Change in BP in baseline PR groups of < 70, 70-79, and ≥ 80 beats/min and posttreatment PR reduction groups of < 1, 1-9, and ≥ 10 beats/min at 24 weeks were evaluated.Results: The unadjusted time-averaged systolic BP (SBP) at 24 weeks was not significantly different within baseline PR groups or posttreatment PR reduction groups, but the unadjusted time-averaged diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly different within both baseline PR (P < 0.001) and posttreatment PR reduction groups (P < 0.001).Significant differences were observed in adjusted time-averaged SBP (≥ 10 beats/min group: β, -3.4148; P = 0.006) and time-averaged DBP (≥ 10 beats/min: β, -4.5781; P < 0.001) only within the posttreatment PR reduction groups.The majority of adverse events reported with nebivolol were mild.Conclusions: The efficacy of nebivolol for BP reduction seems to be indicated not by baseline PR but by posttreatment PR reduction.These findings suggest the presence of other
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=3,011). Posttreatment pulse rate reduction with nebivolol vs. Lower posttreatment pulse rate reduction groups (<1 and 1-9 beats/min) was evaluated on Adjusted time-averaged systolic blood pressure at 24 weeks (β -3.4148, p=0.006). Posttreatment pulse rate reduction of ≥10 beats/min with nebivolol was associated with greater reductions in adjusted time-averaged systolic and diastolic BP.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: