Why the study?
The incidence, significance, and management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with acute heart failure, including cardiogenic shock, have been less studied compared to chronic heart failure.
This consensus statement provides expert guidance on the identification and management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients presenting with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock, an area where standard guidelines have been lacking.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers immediate expert guidance for ventricular arrhythmias in acute HF and cardiogenic shock; extends the management framework for future trials.
Patients presenting with or alerting emergency networks due to acute heart failure (AHF) form a diverse group with a plethora of symptoms, risks, comorbidities, and aetiologies. During AHF, there is an increased risk of destabilizing the functional substrate and modulatory adding to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) already created by the structural substrate. New VAs during AHF have previously identified patients with higher in-hospital and 60-day morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and criteria/best time point for coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, however, are still controversial topics in this difficult clinical setting. The characteristics and logistics of pre-hospital emergency medicine, as well as the density of centres capable of treating AHF and VAs, differ massively throughout Europe. Scientific guidelines provide clear recommendations for the management of arrhythmias in chronic heart failure patients. However, the incidence, significance, and management of arrhythmias in patients with AHF have been less studied. This consensus paper aimed to address the identification and treatment of VAs that complicate the course of patients who have AHF, including cardiogenic shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Görenek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: