Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider in this work the problem of iterated belief revision. We propose a family of belief revision operators called revision with memory operators and we give a logical (both syntactical and semantical) characterization of these operators. They obey what we call the principle of strong primacy of update: when one revises his beliefs by a new evidence, then all possible worlds that satisfy this new evidence become more reliable than those that do not. We show that those operators have a satisfying behaviour concerning the iteration of the revision process. Then we provide four particular operators of this family.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konieczny et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: