Hansson's kernel contraction is a fundamental operation for contracting information from belief bases, which adheres to the Success postulate, ensuring that all non-tautological beliefs are retractable. In this article, we propose a non-prioritised, weakened variant of kernel contraction. To formalise this operation, we introduce the degree of firmness of arbitrary sentences within a belief base (a measure of epistemic entrenchment), drawing from well-established measures of inconsistency. Instead of necessarily withdrawing beliefs, non-prioritised kernel contraction allows for adjusting their degree of firmness, thereby violating the (controversial) Success postulate, while offering greater flexibility in belief change. As we demonstrate, non-prioritised kernel contraction is also perfectly suitable for mitigating inconsistency within belief bases. This new contraction method is constructed using a special type of incision function that determines which sentences are subject to retraction, and is axiomatically characterised by a relaxation of Hansson's original postulates. Finally, we introduce a refined form of classical kernel contraction designed to mitigate inconsistencies within belief bases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theofanis Aravanis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: