Why the study?
Does MSD-ELISA improve sensitivity for FMD viral antigen detection compared to IS-ELISA in clinical samples from cattle and pigs?
Does MSD-ELISA improve sensitivity for FMD viral antigen detection compared to IS-ELISA in clinical samples from cattle and pigs?
MSD-ELISA demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity than conventional IS-ELISA for detecting foot-and-mouth disease viral antigen in clinical samples.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MSD-ELISAs may enhance FMD antigen detection in field samples; leaves open prospective diagnostic validation before routine adoption.
A monoclonal antibody-based sandwich direct ELISA (MSD-ELISA) method was previously developed for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) viral antigen detection. Here we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of two FMD viral antigen detection MSD-ELISAs and compared them with conventional indirect sandwich (IS)-ELISA. The MSD-ELISAs were able to detect the antigen in saliva samples of experimentally-infected pigs for a longer term compared to the IS-ELISA. We also used 178 RT-PCR-positive field samples from cattle and pigs affected by the 2010 type-O FMD outbreak in Japan, and we found that the sensitivities of both MSD-ELISAs were about 7 times higher than that of the IS-ELISA against each sample (P<0.01). In terms of the FMD-positive farm detection rate, the sensitivities of the MSD-ELISAs were about 6 times higher than that of the IS-ELISA against each farm (P<0.01). Although it is necessary to conduct further validation study using the other virus strains, MSD-ELISAs could be appropriate as a method to replace IS-ELISA for FMD antigen detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morioka et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: