Key result
HCM is linked to a ~162% higher risk of infective endocarditis versus matched controls.
Why the study?
Patients with HCM are not currently considered at elevated risk for IE and are excluded from guideline-directed antibiotic prophylaxis, despite structural and haemodynamic features that may predispose to infection.
Does hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increase the risk of infective endocarditis compared to matched controls?
Cohort (n=36,354)
Yes
Does hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increase the risk of infective endocarditis compared to matched controls?
Effect estimate: HR 2.62 (95% CI 2.20 to 3.12)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.25% vs 1.31%
p-value: p=<0.001
Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have a significantly higher risk of infective endocarditis compared to matched controls, suggesting they may represent an intermediate-risk group not currently addressed in prophylaxis guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May warrant IE prophylaxis after HCM valve intervention; extends observational risk data and challenges current guideline exclusions.
Background Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are not currently considered at elevated risk for infective endocarditis (IE) and are excluded from guideline-directed antibiotic prophylaxis, despite structural and haemodynamic features that may predispose to infection. Methods This retrospective cohort study used real-world data from the TriNetX research network, a multicentre electronic health record platform. Adults aged ≥45 years with an ambulatory encounter between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 and a diagnosis of HCM were identified and propensity score matched 1:1 to controls without HCM. A reference group of patients with prior valve intervention was also analysed. The primary outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence of IE, determined by International Classification of Diseases-10 codes. HRs and 95% CIs were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among 18 177 matched HCM-control pairs (mean (SD) age, 65.7 (10.4) years; 43.8% female), the 5-year cumulative incidence of IE was 3.25% in the HCM group and 1.31% in controls (HR, 2.62; 95% CI 2.20 to 3.12; p<0.001). In the valve intervention cohort (n=1916), IE incidence was 6.46% versus 1.52% in controls (HR, 4.21; 95% CI 2.62 to 6.75; p<0.001). In an exploratory subgroup of 231 HCM patients treated with mavacamten, no IE cases occurred during the 1-year follow-up period. Conclusions Patients with HCM had more than twice the 5-year risk of IE compared with matched controls and approximately half the risk seen in patients with valve interventions. HCM may represent an intermediate-risk group not currently addressed in prophylaxis guidelines.
Rosenzveig et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=36,354). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy vs. Controls without HCM was evaluated on 5-year cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis (HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.20 to 3.12, p=<0.001). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with a significantly higher 5-year risk of infective endocarditis compared with matched controls (3.25% vs 1.31%; HR 2.62; 95% CI 2.20-3.12; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: