Key result
Valve disorders, CIEDs, and HCM were associated with a higher risk of infective endocarditis compared with the background population (e.g., valve disorder HR 8.75; 95% CI 6.36-12.02).
Why the study?
What is the risk of infective endocarditis in patients with moderate-risk conditions (valve disorder, CIED, HCM) compared to the background population and high-risk patients?
Cohort (n=137,901)
Yes
What is the risk of infective endocarditis in patients with moderate-risk conditions (valve disorder, CIED, HCM) compared to the background population and high-risk patients?
Effect estimate: HR 8.75 (valve disorder vs background) (95% CI 6.36-12.02)
Patients with moderate-risk conditions (valve disorders, CIED, HCM) have a significantly higher risk of infective endocarditis than the general population, though lower than those with prosthetic valves, highlighting the need for appropriate risk stratification.
May refine IE prophylaxis thresholds for moderate-risk conditions; extends observational data but leaves causal effects and practice change open.
AIMS: Stratification of patients at risk of infective endocarditis (IE) remains a cornerstone in guidance of prophylactic strategies of IE. However, little attention has been given to patients considered at moderate risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish nationwide registries, we assessed the risk of IE in patients with aortic and mitral valve disorders, a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and compared these patient groups with (i) controls from the background population using risk-set matching and (ii) a high-risk population (prosthetic heart valve). Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare risk of IE between risk groups. We identified 83 453 patients with aortic or mitral valve disorder, 50 828 with a CIED, and 3620 with HCM. The cumulative risk of IE after 10 years was 0.9% in valve disorder, 1.3% in CIED, and 0.5% in HCM patients. Compared with the background population, valve disorder, CIED, and HCM carried a higher associated risk of IE, hazard ratio (HR) = 8.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.36-12.02], HR = 6.63 (95% CI 4.41-9.96), and HR = 6.57 (95% CI 2.33-18.56), respectively. All three study groups were associated with a lower risk of IE compared with high-risk patients, HR = 0.27 (95% CI 0.23-0.32) for valve disorder, HR = 0.28 (95% CI 0.23-0.33) for CIED, and HR = 0.13 (95% CI 0.06-0.29) for HCM. CONCLUSIONS: Heart valve disorder, CIED, and patients with HCM were associated with a higher risk of IE compared with the background population but have a lower associated risk of IE compared with high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Østergaard et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Moderate risk for infective endocarditis (n=137,901). Moderate risk conditions (valve disorder, CIED, HCM) vs. Background population and high-risk population (prosthetic heart valve) was evaluated on Infective endocarditis (HR 8.75 (valve disorder vs background), 95% CI 6.36-12.02). Valve disorders, CIEDs, and HCM were associated with a higher risk of infective endocarditis compared with the background population (e.g., valve disorder HR 8.75; 95% CI 6.36-12.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: