Key result
Prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval linked to fourfold higher VT inducibility in AMVP syndrome.
Why the study?
Does a prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval predict ventricular tachycardia inducibility in patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome?
Observational (n=65)
No
Does a prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval predict ventricular tachycardia inducibility in patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval on surface ECG is significantly associated with ventricular tachycardia inducibility in patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome, suggesting its potential as a simple risk stratification marker.
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is commonly benign, but an arrhythmic phenotype (AMVP) with increased risk for sudden cardiac death has been described. A prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval has been association with increased arrhythmic risk in different clinical settings. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible correlation between prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval and ventricular tachycardia (VT) inducibility in MVP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients fulfilling the EHRA criteria of AMVP syndrome underwent programmed ventricular stimulation between 2016 and 2024. Sustained polymorphic VT was induced in 19 patients (29.2%) and was significantly associated with prolonged Tpeak-Tend (100.5 ± 10.3 ms vs. 85.1 ± 9.9 ms, p = 0.002) and prolonged Tpeak-Tend/QTc (0.24 ± 0.03 vs. 0.2 ± 0.02, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Prolonged Tpeak-Tend was associated with VT inducibility in patients with AMVP syndrome, suggesting its potential value as simple ECG-based marker for risk stratification. If Tpeak-Tend also correlates with clinical outcome should be investigated in prospective studies.
Rath et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) syndrome (n=65). Prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval (>90 ms) vs. Normal Tpeak-Tend interval (≤90 ms) was evaluated on Ventricular tachycardia (VT) inducibility during programmed ventricular stimulation (p=0.002). A prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval (>90 ms) was associated with higher ventricular tachycardia inducibility compared to a normal interval (48.4% vs 11.8%, p=0.002) in patients with AMVP syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: