Randomized trial evaluates how end-tidal carbon dioxide levels impact sevoflurane in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, suggesting optimal levels for better outcomes.
Background Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) has anesthetic potency and effectively influences the circulatory system. There’s a relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) levels and the anesthetic’s requirements during the surgical procedure. Aims We aimed to evaluate how varying EtCO 2 levels influence end-tidal sevoflurane (EtSevo) concentration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and methods A total of 90 patients aged 30–65, both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiology class I-II, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recruited for this randomized double-blinded prospective study. Patients were classified by computer-generated random sequence into three equal groups (L, N, and H). The measured EtSevo concentration at 30 min after pneumoperitoneum was the primary outcome. Results EtSevo at all recordings presented statistically significant variance ( P <0.05). The overall sevoflurane consumption in group L was significantly higher than in group N, and group H ( P <0.001). There was a statistically significant variance in the patients’ number who needed to increase sevoflurane and IV bolus fentanyl between the three studied groups ( P <0.05). The intracranial pressure and surgical field quality comparisons showed no statistically significant differences. ( P >0.05). Conclusions The high EtCO 2 levels (40–45 mmHg) could be valuable in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as it had better hemodynamic stability, lower-end-tidal and total consumption of sevoflurane with an effective anesthesia depth and nonclinical significant changes in ABG and no changes in intracranial pressure and surgical field quality assessments compared with the low EtCO 2 (25–30 mmHg) and normal EtCO 2 (30–40 mmHg).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidhom et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: