Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study reveals superior mechanical performance of Cr/Cr(N) coatings in high-temperature environments, indicating effective wear resistance.
Cr–N coatings are promising for severe-service applications owing to their high corrosion and wear resistance, yet their performance is governed by phase constitution and multilayer architecture. In this study, a monolithic Cr coating and three Cr-based multilayer coatings, Cr/Cr(N), Cr/Cr2N, and Cr/CrN, were synthesized by a hybrid DCMS/HiPIMS process and systematically compared with respect to structure, mechanical properties, and oxidation behavior at 900 °C. XRD and TEM showed that Cr/Cr(N) was primarily characterized by a bcc Cr-type structure, while the N-containing layers exhibited slightly expanded lattice spacings relative to pure Cr; no Cr2N precipitates were detected within the resolution of the analyses. Among the multilayers, Cr/Cr(N) provided the most favorable combination of hardness, adhesion, and indentation damage tolerance, reaching 885 HV and a critical scratch load of 80 N while maintaining damage tolerance comparable to monolithic Cr. By contrast, Cr/Cr2N and Cr/CrN displayed more pronounced brittle damage and lower interfacial reliability. Upon oxidation at 900 °C, Cr and Cr/Cr(N) formed relatively compact Cr2O3 scales, whereas Cr/Cr2N, and particularly Cr/CrN, experienced stronger oxidation-induced phase decomposition, blistering, and local delamination. These findings identify Cr(N) solid-solution sublayers as an effective alternative to brittle ceramic nitride layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: