Key result
LCZ696 reduces atherosclerotic lesions ~29% vs hydralazine, but shows no benefit over valsartan.
Why the study?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce atherosclerotic lesion progression and vascular inflammation compared to valsartan or hydralazine in ApoE-/- mice?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce atherosclerotic lesion progression and vascular inflammation compared to valsartan or hydralazine in ApoE-/- mice?
In a mouse model of diet-induced atherosclerosis, sacubitril/valsartan attenuated plaque progression and vascular inflammation similarly to valsartan alone, suggesting the benefits are primarily driven by RAAS inhibition.
No immediate clinical implications in humans; leaves open whether neprilysin inhibition adds benefit beyond RAAS blockade for atherosclerosis.
OBJECTIVE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), simultaneously inhibits neprilysin and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but its effects on diet-induced vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis are unclear. METHODS: LCZ696 (100 mg/kg/day), valsartan (50 mg/kg/day) or hydralazine (10 mg/kg/day) was orally administered to apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice for 20 weeks. En-face Sudan IV staining of the aortic arch, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of abdominal aorta. RESULTS: There were no differences in metabolic parameters between the groups. Valsartan or LCZ696 significantly reduced the progression of atherosclerotic lesions compared to the hydralazine group, as determined by Enface Sudan IV staining of the aortic arch (p<0.05). In the abdominal aorta, valsartan or LCZ696 treatment reduced mRNA expression of inflammatory molecules. However, no significant difference was observed between the valsartan group and the LCZ696 group regarding these atherosclerotic changes and vascular inflammation. CONCLUSION: LCZ696 reduced the progression of diet-induced atherosclerotic plaques and vascular inflammation compared with hydralazine in ApoE-/- mice, but showed no difference compared with the valsartan group. J. Med. Invest. 73 : 116-120, February, 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeda et al. (2026) studied Atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation. LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) vs. Hydralazine (10 mg/kg/day) and valsartan (50 mg/kg/day) was evaluated on Atherosclerotic lesions (percentage of Sudan IV-positive area in aortic arch) (p=<0.05). LCZ696 significantly reduced atherosclerotic lesions compared to hydralazine (23.6% vs 33.1%, p<0.05) in ApoE-/- mice, but showed no significant difference compared to valsartan.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: