Why the study?
LCZ696 has shown clinical efficacy in HFrEF, but its potential effects on HFpEF are still not fully understood.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac diastolic function and reduce hypertrophy compared to valsartan in a mouse model of HFpEF?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac diastolic function and reduce hypertrophy compared to valsartan in a mouse model of HFpEF?
Sacubitril/valsartan provides superior protection against cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction compared to valsartan alone in a preclinical model of HFpEF.
Should not change HFpEF practice; hypothesis-generating for sacubitril/valsartan superiority in animal models.
LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, has shown promising clinical efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, its potential effects on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are still not fully understood. We evaluated the effect of LCZ696 on HFpEF in transverse aortic constriction mice and compared it with the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker, valsartan. We found that LCZ696 improved cardiac diastolic function by reducing ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice with overload-induced diastolic dysfunction. In addition, there was superior inhibition of LCZ696 than stand-alone valsartan. As a potential underlying mechanism, we demonstrated that LCZ696 behaves as a potent suppressor of calcium-mediated calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) signalling transduction pathways. Hence, we demonstrated the protective effects of LCZ696 in overload-induced HFpEF and provided a pharmaceutical therapeutic strategy for related diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: