Key result
Extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery linked to ~66% lower thromboembolic risk versus lateral tunnel.
Why the study?
Thromboembolic events contribute substantially to morbidity and mortality after Fontan surgery, prompting evaluation of the effect of Fontan surgical type on thromboembolic risk.
Does extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery reduce thromboembolic risk compared to lateral tunnel or atriopulmonary connection in patients with univentricular hearts?
Cohort (n=522)
Blinded adjudication
Yes
Does extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery reduce thromboembolic risk compared to lateral tunnel or atriopulmonary connection in patients with univentricular hearts?
Effect estimate: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.13-0.91)
Extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery is associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events compared to lateral tunnel, independent of atrial arrhythmias and thromboprophylaxis.
May support extracardiac conduit over lateral tunnel Fontan to lower thromboembolic risk; leaves open need for randomized trials before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND Thromboembolic events contribute greatly to morbidity and mortality following Fontan surgery for univentricular hearts. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the effect of type of Fontan surgery on thromboembolic risk. METHODS A North American multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled 522 patients with Fontan palliation consisting of an atriopulmonary connection (APC) (21.4%), lateral tunnel (LT) (41.8%), or extracardiac conduit (EC) (36.8%). Thromboembolic complications and new-onset atrial arrhythmia were reviewed and classified by a blinded adjudicating committee. Thromboembolic risk across surgical techniques was assessed by multivariable competing-risk survival regression. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 11.6 years, 10- and 20-year freedom from Fontan conversion, transplantation, or death was 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. New-onset atrial arrhythmias occurred in 4.4, 1.2, and 1.0 cases per 100 person-years with APC, LT, and EC, respectively. APC was associated with a 2.82-fold higher risk of developing atrial arrhythmias (p < 0.001), with no difference between LT and EC (p = 0.95). A total of 71 thromboembolic events, 32 systemic and 39 venous, occurred in 12.8% of subjects, for an overall incidence of 1.1%/year. In multivariable analyses, EC was independently associated with a lower risk of systemic (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.20 vs. LT; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04 to 0.97) and combined (HR: 0.34 vs. LT; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.91) thromboembolic events. A lower incidence of combined thromboembolic events was also observed with antiplatelet agents (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.92) but not anticoagulation (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS The EC Fontan was independently associated with a lower thromboembolic risk after controlling for time-varying effects of atrial arrhythmias and thromboprophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deshaies et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Univentricular hearts requiring Fontan palliation (n=522). Extracardiac conduit (EC) Fontan vs. Lateral tunnel (LT) and atriopulmonary connection (APC) Fontan was evaluated on Combined thromboembolic events (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.91). Extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery was associated with a lower risk of combined thromboembolic events compared to lateral tunnel (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13-0.91).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: