PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 26, 2010Circulation305 citationsOpen Access

Comparison Between Transcatheter and Surgical Prosthetic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

View Full Paper
MCMarie‐Annick ClavelJWJohn G. WebbJRJosep Rodés‐Cabau

Structured PICO

Does TAVI improve LVEF recovery compared to SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced LVEF?

P
Population
Patients with severe aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function considered at high surgical risk
I
Intervention
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
C
Comparator
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR)
O
Outcome
LVEF recoverysurrogate

TAVI may provide a better alternative to SAVR for LVEF recovery in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and depressed LV systolic function.

Abstract

In patients with severe aortic stenosis and depressed LV systolic function, TAVI is associated with better LVEF recovery compared with SAVR. TAVI may provide an interesting alternative to SAVR in patients with depressed LV systolic function considered at high surgical risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clavel et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69effa644f6a06657c21dffdhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.929893
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper