Why the study?
Does current smoking affect in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does current smoking affect in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
The apparent 'smoker's paradox' of lower in-hospital mortality following AMI is largely explained by the younger age and fewer baseline comorbidities of smokers, though a small residual association remains.
BACKGROUND: Current smokers have lower mortality following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than non-smokers. This is often referred to as the "smokers' paradox". Our study explored possible explanations of this phenomenon. METHODS: From the 510,044 cases of AMI in the NRMI 2 from 1 June 1994, through 30 April 1997, 297,458 cases without hospital transfer were analyzed. Characteristics and treatments of tobacco smokers and non-smokers were compared before and after age-standardization. Multivariate logistic models investigated possible associations with in-hospital mortality using clinically relevant variables and interaction terms. RESULTS: Twenty-four per cent of AMI cases were current smokers. Smokers were 14 years younger than non-smokers (mean age 58 vs. 72 years, p<0.001) and had lower in-hospital mortality (8.0% vs. 16.4%, p<0.001). After age-standardization, smokers were more likely than non-smokers to suffer a Q-wave type of infarction, and were less likely to have a prior history of diabetes, hypertension, AMI, angina, cardiac failure, and coronary interventions. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for smoking and mortality was 0.44 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.43-0.45). After adjustment for age the OR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.78-0.83). Additional adjustment for previous medical history/cardiovascular risk factors changed the OR to 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89). Adjustment for additional covariates and interaction terms had little effect. CONCLUSIONS: Smokers with AMI were on average 14 years younger than non-smokers, explaining most of the apparent association of smoking with differences in presentation and treatment, and lower in-hospital mortality. The residual association of smoking and better prognosis, the "smoker's paradox", was not fully explained by measured covariates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gourlay et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: