Why the study?
Does the cardiovascular response to a head-up tilt test differ between patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy controls?
Does the cardiovascular response to a head-up tilt test differ between patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy controls?
Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have baseline hemodynamic differences compared to healthy controls, but their response to orthostatic challenge and incidence of neurally mediated hypotension are similar.
Similar tilt responses in CFS and controls should not yet change testing practices; leaves open baseline hemodynamic contributions to symptoms.
This study examined the cardiovascular response to orthostatic challenge, and incidence and mechanisms of neurally mediated hypotension in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) during a head-up tilt test. Stoke volume was obtained by a thoracic impedance cardiograph, and continuous heart rate and blood pressure were recorded during a 45-min 70 degrees head-up tilt test. Thirty-nine CFS patients and 31 healthy physically inactive control subjects were studied. A positive tilt, i.e. a drop in systolic blood pressure of > 25 mmHg, no concurrent increase in heart rate and/or development of presyncopal symptoms, was seen in 11 CFS patients and 12 control subjects (P > 0.05). During baseline and the first 5 min of head-up tilt, CFS patients had higher heart rate and smaller pulsatile-systolic area than control subjects (P < 0.05). Among subjects who completed the test, those with CFS had higher heart rate and smaller stroke volume (P < 0.05) than corresponding control subjects. When comparing those who had a positive test outcome in each group, CFS patients had higher heart rates and lower pulse pressure and pulsatile-systolic areas during the last 4 min before being returned to supine (P < 0.05). These data show that there are baseline differences in the cardiovascular profiles of CFS patients when compared with control subjects and that this profile is maintained during head-up tilt. However, the frequency of positive tilts and the haemodynamic adjustments made to this orthostatic challenge are not different between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LaManca et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: