Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter analysis reveals TCI score's role in predicting NRM and relapse risk in acute myeloid leukemia patients.
• TCI classifies transplant preparation intensity in real practice. • Higher TCI is associated with increased NRM • Intermediate TCI is linked to a decrease relapse risk • More studies are needed to assess the TCI score when younger patients are included. Background: The Transplant Conditioning Intensity (TCI) score is a novel tool aiming to stratify conditioning intensity more effectively than the existing nomenclature. TCI is predictive of early non-relapse mortality (NRM), 2-year NRM and relapse incidence (RI). Objective: We retrospectively analyzed 455 acute myeloid leukemia patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation reported to Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyetico y Terapia Celular (GETH). Results: Patients were classified as low (TCI 1–2, 44 %, n=200), intermediate (TCI 2.5–3.5, 36%, n=162) or high (TCI 4–6, 20%, n=93). All low‑score cases were reduced‑intensity conditioning, whereas every high‑score TCI was myeloablative. Among intermediate TCI, 97% (n=158) received a myeloablative therapy. Patients were in first complete remission in 83% (n=366) cases. Multivariate analysis revealed an increased NRM for high versus low TCI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.95; p = 0.01) and a reduced RI for intermediate versus low TCI (HR 0.62; p = 0.042). Adverse cytogenetics independently increased both NRM (HR 2.71, p=0.03) and RI (HR 2.26, p=0.006). Age > 65 years was associated with higher NRM (HR 2.72, p=0.04). Conclusion: In a real-world setting, the TCI score effectively differentiates patients by post-transplant outcomes, highlighting high TCI as a key predictor of increased NRM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paviglianiti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: