Background: Reliable preoperative identification of carotid plaque instability remains challenging. Although duplex ultrasound allows early detection of carotid stenosis, it does not consistently predict plaque biological behavior. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression and have been implicated in atherosclerotic progression and plaque destabilization. The tissue-level expression of miRNAs in carotid plaques and their relationship with histological vulnerability remain incompletely defined. Methods: This exploratory, pilot, hypothesis-generating study included patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis (>75% NASCET). Plaque vulnerability was assessed using a multiparametric approach combining preoperative duplex ultrasound features (including Gray Scale Median, GSM), intraoperative macroscopic evaluation, and a validated histological scoring system; only plaques with concordant classification across all three modalities were retained for molecular analysis. Total RNA including small RNA was extracted from plaque tissue and miRNA expression was measured by qRT-PCR on a panel of 47 candidate miRNAs. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-eight patients were initially enrolled; after application of strict vulnerability criteria, five plaques (three unstable, two stable) were selected for miRNA profiling. Among the 47 miRNAs assayed, miR-122 and miR-197 showed a consistent descriptive trend toward higher expression in plaques classified as unstable; these plaques also displayed histological features of vulnerability (lipid-rich necrotic cores and inflammatory infiltrates). Given the extremely limited sample size, no inferential statistical comparisons or multiple-testing corrections were performed. Conclusions: In this small, tissue-based exploratory analysis, miR-122 and miR-197 were more highly expressed in plaques with histological features of instability. Due to the small sample size, the effect estimates are unstable, and the findings should be used solely to inform the design and power calculations of future studies. We outline the need of a clear, pragmatic validation pathway based on replication in independent, larger cohorts with standardized tissue handling and blinded assessment and parallel evaluation of circulating miRNA levels to assess noninvasive biomarker potential. Indeed, these findings are preliminary and strictly hypothesis-generating; validation in larger, prospectively collected cohorts and integration with circulating biomarkers and imaging data are required before clinical application.
Scurto et al. (Tue,) studied this question.