Key result
COI-guided release of high-threshold atrial leadless pacemakers safely improves pacing to 0.8 V at one month.
Why the study?
Very high acute pacing thresholds during AVEIR-AR atrial leadless pacemaker implantation often prompt device repositioning, although excessive manipulation may increase procedural risk.
Does a current-of-injury-guided release strategy improve short-term electrical performance and safety in patients with very high acute pacing thresholds during atrial leadless pacemaker implantation?
Cohort (n=28)
Yes
Does a current-of-injury-guided release strategy improve short-term electrical performance and safety in patients with very high acute pacing thresholds during atrial leadless pacemaker implantation?
A current-of-injury-guided release strategy for atrial leadless pacemakers with very high acute pacing thresholds is feasible and results in improved pacing thresholds at 1 month without compromising safety.
BACKGROUND: Very high acute pacing thresholds (VHPT) during AVEIR-AR atrial leadless pacemaker (ALP) implantation often prompt device repositioning, although excessive manipulation may increase procedural risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and early electrical performance of ALP release despite VHPT using a current-of-injury (COI)-guided strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 consecutive patients who underwent AVEIR-AR ALP implantation at two centers in Japan and compared procedural safety and short-term electrical performance between patients with normal PTs (NPT <5.5 V at 0.4 ms) and those with VHPT (≥5.5 V at 0.4 ms). In the VHPT group, ALP device release was permitted when pre-screw COI was adequate (≥1 mV). RESULTS: The mean age was 85±6 years, body weight was 54±8 kg, and 11 patients were female. Single-site pre-mapping successful implantation was achieved in 36%, and repositioning was avoided in 89%, with no dislodgment, tamponade, or PT-related complications observed. Fourteen patients (50%) had VHPT, with comparable COI values between the VHPT and NPT groups (1.5±0.7 mV vs. 1.4±0.7 mV). In the VHPT group, PT improved from 5.9±0.2 V at tether to 5.1±1.4 V after release, 1.3±0.8 V at discharge, and 0.8±0.6 V at 1-month, with the initial between-group difference no longer evident. Sensitivity analyses using alternative cutoff values (≥5.0 V and ≥6.0 V) demonstrated consistent trends. CONCLUSION: VHPT during ALP implantation improved after device release when adequate COI was present. A COI-guided release strategy may be feasible in selected cases and may help reduce mapping and screw attempts while enhancing procedural safety during ALP implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatani et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial leadless pacemaker implantation (n=28). Current-of-injury (COI)-guided release strategy vs. Normal pacing thresholds (<5.5 V at 0.4 ms) was evaluated on Procedural safety and short-term electrical performance. A current-of-injury-guided release strategy for atrial leadless pacemakers with very high acute pacing thresholds resulted in threshold improvement to 0.8 V at 1 month with no complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: