Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study applies 1H NMR for metabolite identification in mullets, highlighting its effectiveness for traceability.
The global seafood industry faces persistent challenges related to product quality, safety, and authenticity, driven by complex supply chains, increasing demand, and the perishable nature of aquatic products. Traditional analytical methods often fall short in providing rapid, comprehensive, and non-destructive insights into the intricate biochemical changes occurring in seafood. 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy has emerged as a powerful and versatile tool for metabolomics, offering a holistic view of the low-molecular-mass compounds (metabolites) present in biological samples. The present study applied 1H NMR for chemical fingerprint identification in mullets (Mugil liza) from Brazil. Dorsal muscle samples were taken from the fish during summer, autumn, and winter. The procedure involved freeze-drying the muscle tissue, thereafter extracting polar metabolites using designated solvents (methanol, water, and chloroform), and analyzing them using a 600 MHz spectrometer. As a result, 23 metabolites related to degradation biomarkers, essential metabolites, energy expenditure, and muscle structure were identified. The statistical analysis demonstrated a distinct separation between the geographical origins (RJ vs. SC), mostly influenced by variations in the concentrations of lactate, histidine, threonine, phenylalanine, and ornithine. Factors like fish size and seasonal variations did not markedly affect the overall metabolic profile, underscoring the reliability of these chemicals as stable origin indicators. The Principal Component Analysis identified two distinct groups of metabolites, establishing a profile for each geographical origin. The developed protocol can be applied to the processes of geographical identification. Thus, the 1H NMR tool was efficient in determining metabolites that can be considered biomarkers in analyses for seafood traceability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fogaça et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: