PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2011Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology201 citations

Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: The Incidence, Clinical and Electrophysiologic Characteristics, and the Predictors

View Full Paper
CHCan HasdemirCUCem UlucanOYOğuz Yavuzgil

Structured PICO

P
Population
249 consecutive patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and/or ventricular tachycardia (VT), mean age 45 ± 20 years, 148 female / 101 male.
O
Outcome
Incidence, clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics, and predictors of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TICMP), defined as LVEF ≤50% in the absence of underlying heart disease and improvement of LVEF ≥15% following effective treatment.surrogate

A PVC burden of ≥16% is a highly sensitive and specific predictor of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in the form of monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and/or ventricular tachycardia (VT) can cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TICMP). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics, and the predictors of TICMP in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Study population consisted of 249 consecutive patients (148 F/101 M, 45 ± 20 y/o) with frequent PVCs and/or VT. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and 24-hour Holter monitoring. TICMP was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤50% in the absence of any detectable underlying heart disease and improvement of LVEF ≥15% following effective treatment of index ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: Seventeen (6.8%) patients had TICMP. Patients with TICMP compared to patients with preserved LVEF were more likely to be male (65% vs 39%, P = 0.043) and asymptomatic (29% vs 9%, P = 0.018), and were more likely to have higher PVC burden (29.4 ± 9.2 vs 8.1 ± 7.4, P < 0.001), persistence of PVCs throughout the day (65% vs 22%, P = 0.001), and repetitive monomorphic VT (24% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). PVC burden of 16% by ROC curve analysis best separated the patients with TICMP compared to patients with preserved LVEF (sensitivity 100%, specificity 87%, area under curve 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: TICMP was relatively common (∼1 in every 15 patients) in our study population. The predictors of TICMP were male gender, absence of symptoms, PVC burden of ≥16%, persistence of PVCs throughout the day, and the presence of repetitive monomorphic VT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hasdemir et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f69065e405cc4465bc28a7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01986.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper