Why the study?
Do patients with acute HFpEF present with comparable haemodynamic congestion to those with acute HFrEF?
Do patients with acute HFpEF present with comparable haemodynamic congestion to those with acute HFrEF?
In acute decompensated heart failure, patients with HFpEF and HFrEF present with comparable degrees of venous congestion and right ventricular dysfunction, despite HFpEF patients having lower BNP levels.
Acute HFpEF shows comparable venous congestion and RV dysfunction to HFrEF despite lower BNP; leaves open whether decongestion targets should differ by EF phenotype.
AIMS: Congestion is a central feature of acute heart failure (HF) and its assessment is important for clinical decisions (e.g. tailoring decongestive treatments). It remains uncertain whether patients with acute HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are comparably congested as in acute HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). This study assessed congestion, right ventricular (RV) and renal dysfunction in acute HFpEF, HFrEF and non-cardiac dyspnoea. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared echocardiographic and circulating biomarkers of congestion in 146 patients from the MEDIA-DHF study: 101 with acute HF (38 HFpEF, 41 HFrEF, 22 HF with mid-range ejection fraction) and 45 with non-cardiac dyspnoea. Compared with non-cardiac dyspnoea, patients with acute HF had larger left and right atria, higher E/e', pulmonary artery systolic pressure and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter at rest, and lower IVC variability (all P < 0.05). Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and soluble CD146 (sCD146), but not B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), correlated with echocardiographic markers of venous congestion. Despite a lower BNP level, patients with HFpEF had similar evidence of venous congestion (enlarged IVC, left and right atria), RV dysfunction (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion), elevated MR-proANP and sCD146, and renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate; all P > 0.05) compared with HFrEF. CONCLUSION: In acute conditions, HFpEF and HFrEF presented in a comparable state of venous congestion, with similarly altered RV and kidney function, despite higher BNP in HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aelst et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: