Uncovers mechanisms of immune tolerance in recurrent pregnancy loss, suggesting new strategies for management.
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a heterogeneous reproductive disorder in which dysregulation of maternal–fetal immune tolerance, aberrant decidual immune remodeling, and altered inflammasome signaling have been implicated within a complex multi-omics landscape. Multi-omics profiling (genomics, epigenomics, single-cell/spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, microbiome analyses, and immunomics) is increasingly being used to characterize mechanistic heterogeneity in RPL and to support biomarker discovery and immune-informed stratification. Genomic studies have associated chromosomal abnormalities and pathogenic variants with early embryonic developmental failure, while epigenomic profiling has highlighted aberrant methylation patterns and imprinting disturbances. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics have revealed altered cellular composition and disrupted communication among decidual stromal cells, uterine natural killer (uNK) cells, macrophages, regulatory T cells (Treg), T helper 17 (Th17) cells, and trophoblast lineages. Proteomic and metabolomic studies have further identified immune–metabolic signatures associated with impaired trophoblast function and vascular remodeling, while emerging microbiome studies suggest a gut–reproductive axis that may modulate systemic immune homeostasis. Integration of multi-omics datasets with computational frameworks (e.g., weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA), and deep-learning models may improve RPL subtype classification, risk prediction, and the identification of potentially actionable pathways. However, current studies remain limited by small cohort sizes, especially in single-cell datasets, cross-platform heterogeneity, insufficient longitudinal validation, and a lack of multicenter reproducibility. Future work should prioritize standardized multi-omics pipelines, clearer evidence stratification, and immune-centric analytical frameworks to improve the robustness and translational relevance of RPL research. These advances may ultimately support immune-informed risk assessment and contribute to the gradual development of more individualized management strategies for RPL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: