Why the study?
Does cross-sectional echocardiography accurately quantify left ventricular volume in formalin-fixed canine hearts compared to actual fluid volume?
Does cross-sectional echocardiography accurately quantify left ventricular volume in formalin-fixed canine hearts compared to actual fluid volume?
Short-axis area analysis with cross-sectional echocardiography accurately quantifies left ventricular volumes in an ex vivo canine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates short-axis models in ex vivo canine hearts; leaves open translation to in vivo human volumetry.
Cross-sectional echocardiography was used to quantify volume in 21 canine left ventricles that were fixed in formalin and immersed in mineral oil. Area, length and diameter measurements were obtained from short- and long-axis cross-sectional images of the left ventricle and volume was calculated by seven mathematic models. Calculated volume was then compared, by linear regression and percent error analyses, with fluid volume of the left ventricle, obtained by filling the chamber with a known amount of fluid. Volumes ranged from 13-146 ml. Mathematic models using short-axis area and long-axis length gave higher correlation coefficients (r = 0.982 and r = 0.969) and lower mean errors (10-20%) than standard formulas previously used for M-mode echo and angiography. Thus, short-axis area analysis with cross-sectional echocardiography is well-suited for quantifying left ventricular volumes in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wyatt et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: