Key result
Faster biological aging is linked to ~22% higher brain infarct risk and worse brain integrity.
Why the study?
Does a faster DNA methylation-based biological aging pace predict structural and vascular brain damage in older adults?
Cohort (n=2,602)
Does a faster DNA methylation-based biological aging pace predict structural and vascular brain damage in older adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.22 (95% CI 1.07–1.39)
p-value: p=<0.01
A DNA methylation-based biomarker of aging predicts structural and vascular brain damage and mediates the impact of midlife cardiovascular risk factors on late-life brain health.
Background: DNA methylation (DNAm)-based biological aging (BA) is linked to poor structural and functional brain integrity, but prior studies often had small samples, cross-sectional designs, or focused narrowly on specific brain health indicators. We examined whether changes in BA are associated with multiple domains of brain health. Methods: Data were drawn from the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility–Reykjavik Study (AGES-RS), including participants with DNAm, MRI, and cognitive data (baseline mean age = 75.5 ± 4.8 years; 57.6% women). DNAm was assayed using the Illumina Infinium MethylEPIC array. Brain volumes and infarcts were measured by MRI, and cognition by standard tests. BA pace was estimated with DunedinPACE (DDPACE; >1 = faster aging). Baseline data (2002–2006) included 2,602 individuals, with 2,081 re-examined after ~5 years. Associations between baseline DDPACE and brain volume, infarcts, and cognition at follow-up were analyzed, adjusting for age, sex, education, batch, and blood cell composition. DDPACE and continuous outcomes were standardized. Additionally, mediation analyses tested whether baseline DDPACE mediated associations between midlife lifestyle (e.g., smoking) and health factors (e.g., total cholesterol), their composite score (Life’s Simple 7), and late-life brain outcomes (mean age = 81 ± 4.8 years). Results: Higher baseline DDPACE was inversely associated with white matter (WM, β=-0.14, 95% CI -0.19 – -0.09), gray matter (GM, β=-0.09, -0.14 – -0.05), and total brain volume (TBV, β=-0.12, -0.17– -0.08), and positively with WM lesions (WML, β=0.06, 0.01–0.11) at follow-up, all P<0.05. Associations remained significant after adjusting for baseline brain volumes, except WML. Higher baseline DDPACE also predicted poorer cognition (e.g., processing speed β=-0.10, -0.14 – -0.05, P<0.001) and greater brain infarct risk (OR=1.22, 1.07–1.39, P<0.01). Participants who shifted to faster aging (>1 SD above mean at follow-up) had higher WML (β=0.05, 0.01–0.09, P<0.01). Mediation analyses indicated that DDPACE accounted for 18.9–30.7% of the association between midlife smoking and late-life WM, GM, TBV, and WML, and 15–18% of the LS7 effect on these outcomes (all P < 2.2×10 -16 ). Conclusion: A DNAm-based biomarker of aging predicts brain damage and mediates the association of midlife cardiovascular health-related risk factors with late-life brain health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asefa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Structural and vascular brain damage (n=2,602). DNA methylation-based biological aging (DunedinPACE) vs. Lower baseline biological aging was evaluated on Brain infarct risk (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, p=<0.01). Higher baseline DNA methylation-based biological aging predicted greater brain infarct risk (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.07-1.39; P<0.01) and poorer structural brain integrity at 5-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: