Key result
Blood pressure ≥120/80 mmHg is linked to modestly better baseline cognition in high-risk women.
Why the study?
Does exceeding intensive or conservative blood pressure thresholds affect cognitive function and decline in older adults?
Cohort (n=13,318)
Does exceeding intensive or conservative blood pressure thresholds affect cognitive function and decline in older adults?
Mean Difference: 0.094 (95% CI 0.023–0.17)
Blood pressure below intensive thresholds was associated with worse cognitive function and faster decline, particularly among men, suggesting potential cerebrovascular risks of intensive BP control in certain older adults.
Introduction: Sex/gender and age variability in the impact of elevated blood pressure (BP) on older adult cognitive function remains understudied across the continuum of cognition. Hypothesis: Older women at elevated dementia risk (i.e., lower quantiles of cognition) receive less cognitive benefit than men from intensive systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) control, especially in late-life. Methods: We used Health and Retirement Study participants (n = 13,318, aged 51-104, 57.8% women, 76.3% Non-Hispanic White) with data on our biennially-collected outcome of interest: averaged 10-word immediate and delayed word recall scores. Our primary exposures were exceeding intensive (≥120/80 SBP/DBP) or conservative (≥140/90 SBP/DBP) BP thresholds, measured by sphygmomanometer readings in 2006 or 2008. We estimated linear quantile models for associations of exceeding each BP threshold with level (2006/2008) as well as linear quantile mixed effects models for per-year change (2006-2018) in word recall across 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles, evaluating heterogeneity by sex/gender and age (≤ versus > 70 years). Results: Men had higher average BP (mean SBP/DBP: 134/79 (SD: 20/12)) than women (mean SBP/DBP: 130/79 (SD: 21/12)). Both sex/genders scored comparably on baseline word recall (mean: 5 (SD: 1.7)). Exceeding intensive BP thresholds was associated with better baseline cognitive function among women at quantiles indicating higher dementia risk (e.g., β10th = 0.094, 95% CI = 0.023 to 0.170) and among men at most cognitive quantiles (e.g., β90th = 0.076, 95% CI = 0.010 to 0.156)). Among women before age 70 at lower risk for dementia, exceeding conservative (β75th = -0.019, 95% CI = -0.034 to -0.005) but not intensive (β75th = 0.001, 95% CI = -0.002 to 0.004) BP thresholds were associated with faster per-year decline. After age 70, exceeding intensive BP thresholds was associated with slower per-year decline for men at higher as well as lower dementia risk (e.g., β25th = 0.006, 95% CI = 0.000 to 0.012), though estimated effects were imprecise. Conclusions: In conclusion, BP below intensive thresholds was associated with worse cognitive function and faster decline, particularly among men. BP below conservative thresholds was associated with slower decline among women after age 70. Future work should evaluate whether the health benefits of intensive BP control should be weighed against cerebrovascular pathologies such as reduced cerebral perfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sims et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cognitive function and decline (n=13,318). Exceeding intensive (≥120/80 mmHg) or conservative (≥140/90 mmHg) blood pressure thresholds vs. Blood pressure below intensive or conservative thresholds was evaluated on Averaged 10-word immediate and delayed word recall scores (β 0.094, 95% CI 0.023 to 0.170). Exceeding intensive blood pressure thresholds (≥120/80 mmHg) was associated with better baseline cognitive function among women at higher dementia risk (β=0.094; 95% CI 0.023-0.170).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: