Why the study?
Components of arterial stiffness, including structural stiffness from aging and load-dependent stiffness from high blood pressure, are markers for cardiovascular disease risk.
Do polygenic risk scores for blood pressure predict components of carotid arterial stiffness?
Do polygenic risk scores for blood pressure predict components of carotid arterial stiffness?
Blood pressure polygenic risk scores predict load-dependent arterial stiffness but not structural stiffness, highlighting distinct genetic mechanisms for these cardiovascular risk markers.
BP PRSs do not predict structural carotid stiffness; supports distinct mechanisms and leaves open genetic targeting of load-dependent stiffness.
Background: Components of arterial stiffness (structural stiffness from aging and load-dependent stiffness from high blood pressure) are markers for cardiovascular disease risk. We evaluated relationships between polygenic risk scores (PRS) for blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness. Methods: Participants (n=5942) are from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis with measures of carotid ultrasound and genomic DNA. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was calculated from carotid ultrasound representing total stiffness. Structural stiffness was calculated by adjusting PWV to a 120/80 mmHg blood pressure with participant-specific models. Load-dependent stiffness was the difference of total and structural stiffness. Blood pressure PRSs were previously derived from a genome-wide association study. Associations between BP PRSs and components of carotid arterial stiffness were assessed with multivariable-adjusted regression models. Mendelian Randomization (MR) was performed with two-stage least squares to 1) confirm that BP PRSs strongly predict MAP and 2) estimate the effect of MAP on arterial stiffness. Structural carotid stiffness was not associated with any BP PRSs. MR showed that SBP and DPB PRS strongly predict MAP (p<0.001) and each 1-mmHg increase in MAP raised load dependent stiffness by 0.0494 m/s (p<0.001). Conclusion: There are key differences in the genetic underpinnings of the mechanistic components of arterial stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gepner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: