Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows aerobic exercise reduces metabolic syndrome risk in smokers, indicating tailored interventions matter.
PURPOSE This study investigated the “metabolic shield” effect of aerobic exercise on smokers, focusing on gender- and age-specific variations in metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk using recent national representative data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2022-2024.METHODS Data from 12,056 adults (KNHANES 2022-2024) were analyzed. Complex sample logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (α OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for metabolic syndrome components in smokers, adjusting for age, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle factors.RESULTS Aerobic exercise significantly buffered overall MetS risk in smokers(αOR = 0.795, 95% CI: 0.665-0.949, p < 0.05). Analysis of individual components revealed significant risk reductions for abdominal obesity(αOR = 0.791, 95% CI: 0.669-0.934, p < 0.01) and impaired fasting glucose(IFG) or diabetes mellitus(DM)(αOR = 0.778, 95% CI: 0.650-0.932, p < 0.01); however, no statistical significance was observed for high triglycerides, low HDL-C, or hypertension at the total group level. Gender-stratified analysis showed that males had a significantly reduced risk for low HDL-C(α OR = 0.752, 95% CI: 0.584-0.968, p < 0.05), while females showed a prominent reduction in abdominal obesity risk(αOR = 0.742, 95% CI: 0.582-0.945, p < 0.01). In the elderly population (60+), the strongest buffering effect was observed for IFG or DM(αOR = 0.792, 95% CI: 0.665-0.942, p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS Aerobic exercise serves as a critical physiological buffer against smoking-induced metabolic deterioration. These findings highlight the necessity of precision exercise prescriptions tailored to gender and life stages. Implementing professional kinesiologist-led interventions is essential to reduce social healthcare costs and enhance public health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
임유은 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: