Key result
Bucladesine calcium plus metoprolol linked to ~14 ms greater SDNN improvement vs metoprolol alone in HF.
Why the study?
Heart failure with chronic arrhythmias is linked to autonomic dysfunction and poor outcomes, but whether adding bucladesine calcium to metoprolol improves heart rate variability and cardiac function was unknown.
Does adding bucladesine calcium to metoprolol improve heart rate variability and cardiac function in patients with heart failure and chronic arrhythmias?
Observational (n=87)
No
Does adding bucladesine calcium to metoprolol improve heart rate variability and cardiac function in patients with heart failure and chronic arrhythmias?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 13.63 ms (95% CI 4.17-23.09)
Absolute Event Rate: 22.23% vs 8.6%
p-value: p=0.005
Should not yet change practice in HF with arrhythmia; hypothesis-generating for bucladesine calcium to improve HRV and LVEF pending RCTs.
Background Heart failure (HF) with chronic arrhythmias is associated with autonomic dysfunction and poor outcomes. Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic dysfunction and predicts outcomes in HF. This study investigated whether adding bucladesine calcium to metoprolol improves HRV and cardiac function compared with metoprolol alone. Methods This single-center retrospective observational study included 87 patients with HF and chronic arrhythmia treated between January 2023 and April 2024. Patients received metoprolol tartrate alone (control group, n = 41) or bucladesine calcium combined with metoprolol (observation group, n = 46) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change from baseline in HRV time-domain parameters. Between-group differences were compared with 95% confidence intervals. Exploratory sensitivity and multivariable-adjusted analyses were performed. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The combination group showed significantly greater improvements in ΔSDNN [mean difference 13.63 ms, 95% CI (4.17, 23.09), P = 0.005] and ΔRMSSD [8.94 ms, (2.80, 15.08), P = 0.005]. ΔLF/HF showed a borderline difference ( P = 0.043). ΔLVEF was significantly greater [4.86%, (1.31, 8.41), P = 0.008], as was ΔCO ( P = 0.019), while ΔLVEDd did not differ significantly ( P = 0.395). The overall response rate was numerically higher (89.1% vs. 78.0%) but not statistically significant ( P = 0.266). Adverse event rates were comparable. After multivariable adjustment, ΔSDNN ( P = 0.037) and ΔRMSSD ( P = 0.042) remained significant, while ΔLVEF became borderline ( P = 0.062). Conclusion Adding bucladesine calcium to metoprolol was associated with greater improvements in HRV time-domain parameters and LVEF, though effects were attenuated after covariate adjustment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure with chronic arrhythmias (n=87). Bucladesine calcium combined with metoprolol vs. Metoprolol tartrate alone was evaluated on Change from baseline in SDNN at 12 weeks (Mean difference 13.63 ms, 95% CI 4.17-23.09, p=0.005). Bucladesine calcium combined with metoprolol significantly improved heart rate variability, increasing SDNN by a mean difference of 13.63 ms compared to metoprolol alone in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: