Four commercial wrist-worn devices showed small but systematic deviations from ECG criterion heart rate (p<0.001), with greater error observed among participants with higher BMI and darker skin tones.
Cross-Sectional (n=58)
Do commercial wrist-worn PPG devices accurately measure heart rate compared to ECG in Hispanic adults with Fitzpatrick III-V skin tones?
Commercial wrist-worn PPG devices exhibit systematic deviations in heart rate accuracy compared to ECG, with errors exacerbated by higher BMI and darker skin tones, highlighting the need for equity-focused algorithm refinement.
p-value: p=<0.001
Wearable devices are widely used for heart rate (HR) monitoring, yet their accuracy across varying BMI and Fitzpatrick skin tones remains uncertain. This study evaluated four wrist-worn devices (Apple, Fitbit, Samsung, Garmin) in 58 Hispanic adults with Fitzpatrick skin types III–V during a cycling protocol alternating moderate (64–76% HRmax) and vigorous (77–95% HRmax) intensities. Criterion HR was obtained via Polar H10 ECG, with agreement assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean bias, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), complemented by Bland–Altman visualization. All devices showed small but systematic deviations from the ECG criterion (p < 0.001). Apple and Garmin exhibited the lowest MAE, whereas Fitbit and Samsung showed greater error. Within this cohort, greater dispersion of error around the mean bias line in the Bland–Altman plots was observed among participants with higher BMI and darker (Fitzpatrick V) skin tones, consistent with phenotype-linked agreement drift. These findings support inferences about commercial wrist-PPG devices in Hispanic adults with Fitzpatrick III–V and underscore the need for equity-focused algorithm refinement.
Kostrna et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart rate monitoring accuracy (n=58). Wrist-worn devices (Apple, Fitbit, Samsung, Garmin) vs. Polar H10 ECG was evaluated on Heart rate accuracy (MAE, MAPE, mean bias, ICC) (p=<0.001). Four commercial wrist-worn devices showed small but systematic deviations from ECG criterion heart rate (p<0.001), with greater error observed among participants with higher BMI and darker skin tones.