Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 2 reconstruction algorithms (multisegment and halfscan) for computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography in patients without beta-blocker medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 42 significant coronary stenoses in 136 main coronary branches were examined using a 16-slice CT scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). Twenty-seven patients (79%) had heart rates above 65 beats/min. RESULTS: Without exclusion of branches the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and rate of nonassessable segments with multisegment versus halfscan reconstruction were 88 versus 74%, 91 versus 71%, 90 versus 72%, and 2 versus 21% (P < 0.01), respectively. Multisegment reconstruction improved the average vessel length free of motion artifacts by 56% compared with halfscan reconstruction (P < 0.01). Image quality in terms of vessel continuity and visibility of side branches (P < 0.005) was significantly better using multisegment reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Multisegment reconstruction has superior diagnostic accuracy and image quality compared with halfscan reconstruction in patients with normal heart rates.
Dewey et al. (Fri,) studied this question.