RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 2 reconstruction algorithms (multisegment and halfscan) for computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography in patients without beta-blocker medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 42 significant coronary stenoses in 136 main coronary branches were examined using a 16-slice CT scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). Twenty-seven patients (79%) had heart rates above 65 beats/min. RESULTS: Without exclusion of branches the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and rate of nonassessable segments with multisegment versus halfscan reconstruction were 88 versus 74%, 91 versus 71%, 90 versus 72%, and 2 versus 21% (P < 0.01), respectively. Multisegment reconstruction improved the average vessel length free of motion artifacts by 56% compared with halfscan reconstruction (P < 0.01). Image quality in terms of vessel continuity and visibility of side branches (P < 0.005) was significantly better using multisegment reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Multisegment reconstruction has superior diagnostic accuracy and image quality compared with halfscan reconstruction in patients with normal heart rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewey et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: