Key result
Revascularization with PCI or CABG is linked to improved LVEF and global strain versus OMT.
Why the study?
Revascularization may enhance cardiac outcomes in ischemic HF, but its impact on sensitive measures of myocardial strain assessed by 2D-STE required evaluation.
Does revascularization improve left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial strain compared to optimal medical therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure?
Cohort (n=78)
No
Does revascularization improve left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial strain compared to optimal medical therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure?
Revascularization by PCI or CABG significantly improves left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial strain compared to medical therapy alone in patients with ischemic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Revascularization was associated with improved LV function in ischemic HF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major global health burden, with ischemic heart disease (IHD) being a leading cause due to myocardial damage and impaired cardiac function. While left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the conventional measure of cardiac performance, two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) provides a more sensitive assessment of myocardial strain, allowing early detection of dysfunction. Revascularization procedures, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), may enhance cardiac outcomes in ischemic HF. This study evaluated the impact of revascularization on LVEF and left ventricular strain using 2D-STE. Methods: A follow-up study was conducted at Kobri Al-Kobba Specialized Cardiology Hospital, Egypt, in 2023, involving 78 ischemic HF patients with LVEF ≤50%. Patients were allocated into a control group (30 patients) receiving optimal medical therapy and an interventional group (48 patients) undergoing PCI (27) or CABG (21). Echocardiography with 2D-STE was performed before and after treatment to assess LVEF, global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and global circumferential strain (LVGCS). Results: After treatment, the interventional group showed significant improvement in LVEF (P=0.017), ΔLVEF (P=0.02), LVGLS (P<0.001), and LVGCS (P<0.001) versus the control group. Within the interventional group, PCI patients demonstrated higher post-treatment LVEF (P<0.001), LVGLS (P<0.001), and LVGCS (P=0.006), while CABG patients showed superior ΔLVGCS (P=0.014). No significant baseline differences existed between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarek Ibrahim Abdelhamed (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart failure (n=78). Revascularization (PCI or CABG) vs. Optimal medical therapy was evaluated on LVEF, global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and global circumferential strain (LVGCS) (p=P=0.017). Revascularization with PCI or CABG improved LVEF, global longitudinal strain, and global circumferential strain versus optimal medical therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: