Why the study?
Prior studies of ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture excluded ICD, CRT, and upgrade procedures, and suggested a potential higher risk of bleeding.
Is ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture safe and feasible for cardiac device implantation in patients on antithrombotic therapy?
Is ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture safe and feasible for cardiac device implantation in patients on antithrombotic therapy?
Ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture is a fast, feasible, and safe approach for cardiac device implantation in patients on antithrombotic therapy, with no bleeding complications observed.
Supports UGAVP feasibility on antithrombotics; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture (UGAVP) for cardiac devices implantation has been developed because of its rapidity, safety and potential long-term lead protection. Early work excluded defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and upgrade procedures. Compared to the cephalic approach, in previous studies, there was a greater use of pressure dressings with this technique, suggesting a higher risk of bleeding. AIMS: To assess UGAVP in patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) undergoing cardiac devices implantation including CRT/ICD. METHODS: Prospectively, consecutive patients eligible for a pacemaker or ICD implantation were included. All procedures were performed by a single operator, experienced with UGAVP for femoral access, and fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access. Guidewires insertion time (from lidocaïne administration), and complications were systematically studied. RESULTS: From 457 cardiac device implantations, 200 patients (77.8 ± 10 y, male 58%) 360 leads were implanted by UGAVP including 36 ICD, 54 CRT and 14 upgrade procedures. A majority (90%) was under ATT: Vitamin K Antagonist or Heparin (n = 58, 29%), direct oral anticoagulant (n = 46, 23%), dual antithrombotic therapy (n = 18, 9%) and single antiplatelet drug (n = 82, 41%). UGAVP was successful in 95.78%. Mean insertion time for 1.8 guidewires per patient was 4.68 ± 3.6 min. No complication (no hematoma) was observed during the follow-up (mean of 45 ± 10 months). Guidewires insertion time reached its plateau after 15 patients. CONCLUSION: UGAVP is fast, feasible and safe for patients under ATT undergoing device implantation including CRT/ICD and upgrade procedures, with a short learning curve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eljamili et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: