Key result
hsCRP testing refines cardiovascular risk stratification in intermediate primary and high-risk secondary prevention patients.
Why the study?
It remains controversial whether traditional global risk detection algorithms should be modified by incorporating high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) testing for cardiovascular risk prediction.
Does high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) testing improve the prediction of cardiovascular events among individuals at intermediate risk?
Does high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) testing improve the prediction of cardiovascular events among individuals at intermediate risk?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Selective use of hsCRP testing is recommended to improve risk stratification in primary prevention for intermediate-risk individuals and in secondary prevention for high-risk patients on statins.
Over 20 large-scale prospective studies show that the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events that additionally predicts risk of incident hypertension and diabetes. In many studies, the relative impact of hsCRP is at least as large as that individually of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, or smoking, and knowledge of hsCRP correctly reclassifies a substantial proportion of "intermediate-risk" individuals into clinically relevant higher- or lower-risk categories. Other studies show the relative benefit of statins to be greater among those with increased hsCRP and that achieved hsCRP levels after statin therapy predict recurrent event rates as much as achieved levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Nonetheless, it remains controversial whether the time has come to modify traditional algorithms used for global risk detection. As described here, 6 areas of controversy regarding hsCRP are resolvable with a consensus position that focuses in primary prevention on selective use among individuals with 5% to 20% 10-year risk as estimated by Adult Treatment Panel III, and focuses in secondary prevention on high-risk patients being treated with statin therapy. Forthcoming trial data could expand or contract this "screen selectively" policy, and investigators should be open to the possibility that second-generation inflammatory biomarkers may be developed that supplant hsCRP altogether. In the meantime, however, this consensus position on hsCRP should be one to which both advocates and critics of the inflammatory hypothesis of atherosclerosis can adhere because it is one that can immediately improve patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul M. Ridker (2007) conducted a review in Cardiovascular risk. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) testing was evaluated. Selective use of hsCRP testing is recommended for primary prevention in individuals with 5% to 20% 10-year cardiovascular risk and for secondary prevention in high-risk patients on statins.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: