Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Patients With Severe Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation provide similar efficacy and safety in patients with bicuspid aortic valve compared to those without?
Population
229 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation…
Comparison
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in… vs Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
30-day
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
Supports similar short-term TAVI safety in selected BAV patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of durability.
Structured PICO
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation provide similar efficacy and safety in patients with bicuspid aortic valve compared to those without?
P
Population
229 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation evaluated by both echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography, mean age 83.1, EuroSCORE 20.0%.
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (n=21)
C
Comparator
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients without bicuspid aortic valve (n=208)
O
Outcome
Clinical outcomes including device success, annulus rupture, valve migration, post-procedural mean gradient, aortic regurgitation ≥2 of 4, 30-day mortality, and 30-day combined safety end pointsafety
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in selected patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis demonstrates similar procedural success, safety, and 30-day outcomes compared to patients with tricuspid aortic valves.
Cite This Study
Hayashida et al. (2013) studied this question.