Key result
Immediate complete revascularization shows no benefit over staged PCI for complex nonculprit lesions.
Why the study?
The optimal timing of complete revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndrome, multivessel disease, and complex nonculprit coronary lesions remained unclear.
Does immediate complete revascularization compared with staged complete revascularization reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or cerebrovascular events at 2 years in patients with acute coronary syndrome, multivessel disease, and complex nonculprit coronary lesions?
RCT (n=1,525)
Randomized to immediate complete revascularization vs staged complete revascularization
Does immediate complete revascularization compared with staged complete revascularization reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or cerebrovascular events at 2 years in patients with acute coronary syndrome, multivessel disease, and complex nonculprit coronary lesions?
In patients with ACS and multivessel disease, complex nonculprit lesions carry a higher 2-year risk of adverse clinical outcomes driven by myocardial infarction, but the treatment effect of immediate versus staged complete revascularization does not significantly differ by lesion complexity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports either immediate or staged complete revascularization in ACS with complex nonculprit lesions; confirms similar efficacy regardless of lesion complexity.
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of complete revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndrome, multivessel disease and complex nonculprit coronary lesions (NCL) remains unclear. METHODS: The BIOVASC trial randomized patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease to immediate complete revascularization and staged complete revascularization. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or cerebrovascular events at 2-year follow-up. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, patients were classified as having complex NCL if at least 1 nonculprit lesion met the following criteria: true bifurcation; severe calcification; lesion length >20 mm; aorto-ostial lesion; left main lesion. We aimed to compare a strategy of immediate complete revascularization and staged complete revascularization in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease with complex NCL. Moreover, we sought to compare patients with complex and noncomplex NCLs in terms of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 1525 patients enrolled in the BIOVASC trial, 550 (36.1%) had a complex NCL. The presence of a complex NCL was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the primary end point compared with noncomplex NCL (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.11–2.02]; P =0.01), including spontaneous myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.12–3.09]; P =0.02). In patients with complex NCL, the cumulative incidence of the primary end point was 15.7% in the immediate complete revascularization group and 17.5% in the staged complete revascularization group (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.57–1.31]; P =0.49). No significant interaction was observed between the presence of a complex NCL and revascularization strategy for the primary end point ( P for interaction=0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease, patients with complex NCL experienced worse clinical outcomes at 2-year follow-up, driven by higher rates of myocardial infarction. However, no statistically significant interaction was observed between NCL complexity and the effect of immediate complete revascularization versus staged complete revascularization. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03621501.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scherillo et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease with complex or noncomplex nonculprit coronary lesions (n=1,525). Immediate complete revascularization vs. Staged complete revascularization was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or cerebrovascular events at 2-year follow-up (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57-1.31, p=0.49). Immediate complete revascularization yielded similar 2-year primary composite outcomes to staged revascularization in complex nonculprit lesions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: