Why the study?
Can heart failure guidelines developed for acquired heart disease be applied to adult patients with congenital heart disease?
Can heart failure guidelines developed for acquired heart disease be applied to adult patients with congenital heart disease?
Highlights the critical gap in evidence-based heart failure therapies for adult congenital heart disease patients without a systemic left ventricle, while supporting standard guideline use for those with a systemic left ventricle.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports standard HF guidelines in systemic LV ACHD; leaves open evidence-based options for non-systemic LV cases.
There is a growing population of adult patients with congenital heart defects in the developed world. Most have been repaired, but few have been cured. Many have myocardial dysfunction. Most have exercise intolerance. Some have heart failure. As a group, they show neurohormonal activation similar to that seen in an adult heart failure population with acquired heart disease. Currently, the patients at greatest risk of heart failure are those without a systemic left ventricle, such as Mustard and Senning repairs of transposition of the great arteries (TGA), congenitally corrected TGA, and patients who have had a Fontan procedure. Exercise intolerance may predict hospitalization and death in such patients. For those patients with systemic left ventricles, it would seem reasonable to use the heart failure guidelines developed for patients with acquired heart disease. For those patients without a systemic left ventricle (e.g., a systemic right ventricle or single ventricle), there is currently no foundation for evidence-based therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaddy et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: