Meta-analysis reveals self-compassion shows strong negative associations with psychopathology symptoms like anxiety and depression.
Objectives This meta-analysis provided a comprehensive synthesis of research on the relationship between trait self-compassion (SC), operationalised by the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), and symptoms of psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, PTSD, and eating disorders. Given that SC is a multifaceted construct, we examined it at the overall, dimensional (compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding; CS and UCS), and component levels (mindfulness, self-kindness, common humanity, self-judgement, over-identification and isolation) to identify distinct patterns of association. Method We analysed 256 studies (1106 effect sizes; N = 107,304) with a three-level approach to meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Results Overall SC showed a strong negative association with psychopathology symptoms ( r = −0.50). The UCS dimension ( r = 0.49) was more strongly linked to psychopathology than the CS dimension ( r = −0.31). The UCS dimension showed the strongest association with depression ( r = 0.53) and anxiety ( r = 0.49), followed by eating disorders ( r = 0.44) and PTSD ( r = 0.26), while the CS dimension showed its strongest association with depression ( r = −0.35). At the component level, self-kindness was consistently linked to lower psychopathology across symptom domains, while mindfulness and common humanity had the strongest associations with lower PTSD symptoms. Over-identification and isolation showed stronger links to symptoms in non-clinical and medically vulnerable groups (all p < 0.05). Additionally, age, gender, ethnicity, and publication year did not significantly moderate these associations (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Our findings demonstrated the transdiagnostic relevance of SC and emphasise the need to treat it as a multifaceted construct when examining its relationship with psychopathology. Preregistration This study is not preregistered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: