Why the study?
Does inspiratory muscle training improve cardiac autonomic modulation, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does inspiratory muscle training improve cardiac autonomic modulation, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure?
Home-based inspiratory muscle training improves cardiac autonomic modulation, reduces sympathetic nerve activity, and enhances functional capacity in patients with chronic heart failure.
Hypothesis-generating for inspiratory muscle training in heart failure; controlled trials needed to confirm effects.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on cardiac autonomic modulation and on peripheral nerve sympathetic activity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Functional capacity, low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components of heart rate variability, muscle sympathetic nerve activity inferred by microneurography, and quality of life were determined in 27 patients with CHF who had been sequentially allocated to 1 of 2 groups: (1) control group (with no intervention) and (2) IMT group. Inspiratory muscle training consisted of respiratory exercises, with inspiratory threshold loading of seven 30-minute sessions per week for a period of 12 weeks, with a monthly increase of 30% in maximal inspiratory pressure (PI(max)) at rest. Multivariate analysis was applied to detect differences between baseline and followup period. RESULTS: Inspiratory muscle training significantly increased PI(max) (59.2 ± 4.9 vs 87.5 ± 6.5 cmH(2)O, P = .001) and peak oxygen uptake (14.4 ± 0.7 vs 18.9 ± 0.8 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), P = .002); decreased the peak ventilation (VE)/carbon dioxide production (VCO(2)) ratio (35.8 ± 0.8 vs 32.5 ± 0.4, P = .001) and the VE/VCO(2) slope (37.3 ± 1.1 vs 31.3 ± 1.1, P = .004); increased the HF component (49.3 ± 4.1 vs 58.4 ± 4.2 normalized units, P = .004) and decreased the LF component (50.7 ± 4.1 vs 41.6 ± 4.2 normalized units, P = .001) of heart rate variability; decreased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (37.1 ± 3 vs 29.5 ± 2.3 bursts per minute, P = .001); and improved quality of life. No significant changes were observed in the control group. CONCLUSION: Home-based IMT represents an important strategy to improve cardiac and peripheral autonomic controls, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mello et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: