Why the study?
To characterize the longer-term effectiveness and safety of uRDN versus sham at 6 months after the blinded addition of antihypertensive treatments.
Does ultrasound renal denervation reduce blood pressure and the need for antihypertensive treatments at 6 months compared to a sham procedure in patients with mild to moderate or resistant hypertension?
Does ultrasound renal denervation reduce blood pressure and the need for antihypertensive treatments at 6 months compared to a sham procedure in patients with mild to moderate or resistant hypertension?
Ultrasound renal denervation maintains blood pressure-lowering efficacy at 6 months compared to a sham procedure, requiring fewer added antihypertensive medications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports uRDN for sustained BP control with less medication burden; extends prior trial data to 6 months with meta-analytic confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The randomized, sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN (A Study of the Recor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension) SOLO, RADIANCE-HTN TRIO, and RADIANCE II (A Study of the Recor Medical Paradise System in Stage II Hypertension) trials independently met their primary end point of a greater reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) 2 months after ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) in patients with hypertension. To characterize the longer-term effectiveness and safety of uRDN versus sham at 6 months, after the blinded addition of antihypertensive treatments (AHTs), we pooled individual patient data across these 3 similarly designed trials. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate hypertension who were not on AHT or with hypertension resistant to a standardized combination triple AHT were randomized to uRDN (n=293) versus sham (n=213); they were to remain off of added AHT throughout 2 months of follow-up unless specified blood pressure (BP) criteria were exceeded. In each trial, if monthly home BP was ≥135/85 mm Hg from 2 to 5 months, standardized AHT was sequentially added to target home BP <135/85 mm Hg under blinding to initial treatment assignment. Six-month outcomes included baseline- and AHT-adjusted change in daytime ambulatory, home, and office SBP; change in AHT; and safety. Linear mixed regression models using all BP measurements and change in AHT from baseline through 6 months were used. There was no heterogeneity between trials. Safety outcomes were few and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This individual patient-data analysis of 506 patients included in the RADIANCE trials demonstrates the maintenance of BP-lowering efficacy of uRDN versus sham at 6 months, with fewer added AHTs. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02649426 and NCT03614260.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azizi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: