Why the study?
Multiple guidelines exist for HFpEF, prompting a systematic review of national and international recommendations on adult HFpEF management to aid clinical decision-making.
Systematic Review (n=7)
This systematic review highlights areas of consensus and discrepancy in current HFpEF guidelines, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic thresholds and guidance on emerging therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inconsistent HFpEF diagnostic thresholds across guidelines risk nonuniform diagnosis; leaves open the need for international harmonization.
Multiple guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We systematically reviewed current guidelines and recommendations, developed by national and international medical organizations, on the management of HFpEF in adults to aid clinical decision-making. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 28 February 2024 for publications over the last 10 years as well as websites of organizations relevant to guideline development. Of the 10 guidelines and recommendations retrieved, 7 showed considerable rigour of development and were subsequently retained for analysis. There was consensus on the definition of HFpEF and the diagnostic role of serum natriuretic peptides and resting transthoracic echocardiography. Discrepancies were identified in the thresholds of serum natriuretic peptides and transthoracic echocardiography parameters used to diagnose HFpEF. There was agreement on the general pharmacological and supportive management of acute and chronic HFpEF. However, differences exist in strategies to identify and address specific phenotypes. Contemporary guidelines for HFpEF management agree on measures to avoid its development and the consideration of cardiac transplantation in advanced diseases. There were discrepancies in recommended frequency of surveillance for patients with HFpEF and sparse recommendations on screening for HFpEF in the general population, use of diagnostic scoring systems, and the role of newly emerging therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmood et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=7). Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations was evaluated on Consensus and discrepancies in HFpEF diagnosis and management guidelines. A systematic review of 7 clinical practice guidelines for HFpEF management found consensus on definitions and general pharmacological management, but discrepancies in diagnostic thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: