Key result
Flow-mediated dilatation is significantly reduced in patients with two or more cardiovascular risk factors compared to those with none, with coronary artery disease having the strongest negative impact.
Why the study?
Does the accumulation of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and diseases reduce flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in hospitalized patients?
Observational (n=617)
No
Does the accumulation of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and diseases reduce flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in hospitalized patients?
p-value: p=<0.001
Flow-mediated dilatation assessment has limited value for further risk stratification in high-risk patients, as the presence of two or more cardiovascular risk factors does not lead to a proportional further decrease in endothelial function.
FMD adds limited value for further stratification in high-risk patients; leaves open its role in lower-risk or primary prevention cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Since flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is influenced by different factors, its clinical usefulness and validation is widely discussed. AIM: To assess the major factors that determine FMD values in a wide range of subjects with and without cardiovascular (CV) risk factors/diseases (CVRF/CVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: 617 consecutive patients (mean age: 50.1 ± 14.9 years, males: 349/56.5%) hospitalised between 2005 and 2011 were enrolled into the study. Demographic data and CVRF/CVD with a significant impact on FMD values were analysed: hyperlipidaemia, active smoking, arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus and heart valve disease. The population was divided depending on the number of coexisting CVRF/CVD (0-, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-CVRF/CVD groups). The median FMD value in the entire group of patients was 10% (5-17). An analysis of the FMD percentage in particular groups showed significantly higher FMD values in patients without any CVRF/CVD (group 0), as well as in patients with one coexisting CVRF/CVD (group 1) compared to the other groups. The presence of two or more CVRF/CVD was not associated with a significantly higher FMD reduction. The analysis of patients with only one CVRF/CVD revealed the lowest FMD values in patients with coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: FMD is related to the number of traditional CVRF/CVDs; however, coronary artery disease has the most significant influence on FMD decrease among analysed factors. The value of FMD assessment in high risk patients is limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizia‐Stec et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk factors and diseases (n=617). Presence of cardiovascular risk factors/diseases vs. Absence of cardiovascular risk factors/diseases was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) percentage (p=<0.001). Flow-mediated dilatation is significantly reduced in patients with two or more cardiovascular risk factors compared to those with none, with coronary artery disease having the strongest negative impact.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: