Key result
The TAT/PIC ratio before intracoronary thrombolysis was higher in AMI patients with unsuccessful versus successful recanalization.
Why the study?
Does the TAT/PIC ratio predict the success of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=38)
Does the TAT/PIC ratio predict the success of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
The TAT/PIC ratio before thrombolytic therapy may serve as a useful biomarker for predicting recanalization success in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May predict unsuccessful recanalization after intracoronary thrombolysis in AMI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
To clarify the relationship between the results of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy (ICT) and fibrino-coagulation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and fibrinopeptide A (FPA), as indices of accelerated coagulation, and the plasmin- alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), as an index of accelerated fibrinolysis in peripheral blood, were measured just before and after heparin injection (5,000 U), and immediately after ICT. Twenty-four patients with AMI were divided into 2 groups according to the results of ICT; successful ICT (group S) and unsuccessful ICT (group F). As a control group (group C), 14 age-matched normal volunteers were also studied. The levels of TAT and FPA before ICT were significantly higher in groups S and F than in group C (p < 0.01). The TAT level before ICT in group F was higher than that in group S (p = 0.07), however, the TAT, FPA and PIC levels showed no significant differences between groups S and F at each sampling time. TAT/PIC before ICT was significantly higher in group F than in group S (F: 0.026 +/- 0.020 vs S: 0.008 +/- 0.004, p < 0.05), whereas there was no remarkable difference in FPA/PIC between groups S and F. These results indicate that hyper-coagulation had occurred in the AMI cases and that coagulation had been more accelerated in group F. TAT/PIC might be an index of the equilibrium of the fibrino-coagulating system. Therefore, TAT/PIC measurement before thrombolytic therapy may be more useful than TAT measurement alone for evaluating recanalization in ICT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uenomachi et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=38). Intracoronary thrombolytic therapy (ICT) and Heparin vs. Successful vs Unsuccessful ICT was evaluated on TAT/PIC ratio before intracoronary thrombolytic therapy (p=<0.05). The TAT/PIC ratio before intracoronary thrombolysis was higher in AMI patients with unsuccessful versus successful recanalization.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: