Why the study?
Does preceding intracoronary thrombolysis plus PTCA improve acute phase flow restoration in AMI patients with intracoronary thrombus compared to PTCA alone?
Does preceding intracoronary thrombolysis plus PTCA improve acute phase flow restoration in AMI patients with intracoronary thrombus compared to PTCA alone?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adjunctive thrombolysis before PTCA should not yet change practice; leaves open its role in flow restoration for AMI with thrombus.
Thrombus in the infarct-related artery is one of the limitations for flow restoration in primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The present study investigated the benefit of preceding intracoronary thrombolysis (ICT) by retrospectively analyzing acute phase flow restoration in 80 AMI patients with intracoronary thrombus: 40 undergoing primary PTCA alone (primary PTCA group) and 40 treated with preceding ICT plus PTCA (combined group). Acute phase Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade flow was as follows: TIMI 0/1: 35.0% vs 12.5% for the primary PTCA group and the combined group, p=0.06; TIMI 2: 7.5% vs 15.0%, p=NS; TIMI 3: 57.5% vs 72.5%, p=NS). In the subgroup analysis, it was also less in the combined group among 33 patients with a left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) lesion (42.1 % vs 7.1%, p=0.08), but not among the remaining 47 with either a right coronary artery or left circumflex artery lesion. The combined therapy may potentially provide better acute phase flow restoration in AMI patients with an intracoronary thrombus in a LAD lesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishibashi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: