Key result
Delayed recanalization with percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction resulted in lower left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months compared to non-diabetic patients.
Why the study?
Does delayed recanalization with PCI improve left ventricular function differently in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=125)
Single-blind
No
Does delayed recanalization with PCI improve left ventricular function differently in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction?
Delayed recanalization with PCI in diabetic patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction yields less improvement in left ventricular function compared to non-diabetics, likely due to insufficient microvascular reperfusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not alter PCI timing in diabetic AMI; leaves open optimal strategy pending randomized trials.
To investigate the effects of delayed recanalization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the left ventricular function after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction in diabetes (DM) and non-DM patients, a total of 125 consecutive subjects with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction were recruited and divided into DM group (n=43) and non-DM group (n=82) based on the presence of DM. All patients received successful PCI at about 2 weeks after symptom onset. Ischemic viable myocardium was detected with low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiogram test, and left ventricular function and wall motion were also assessed before PCI. Clinical manifestations and angiograms before and after PCI were analyzed. Levels of creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin T (TnT) before PCI, 6 and 24 h after PCI were determined. All patients received clinical and echocardiographic follow-up 6 months after PCI. Higher rate of TIMI flow grade 2 and lower rate of TIMI flow grade 3 were observed immediately after PCI, and the elevation of serum CK-MB and/or TnT levels were higher in DM group when compared with non-DM group (P 0.05). There were no significant differences in the LVEF, LVEDVI, LVESVI or wall motion score (WMS) between two groups before PCI (P>0.05). But, 6 months after PCI, WMS and LVEF were decreased and increased, respectively, in non-DM group, and the WMS and LVEF in DM group were not changed and the LVEDVI increased, when compared with before PCI. The LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, and WMS differed significantly between two groups 6 months after PCI. Compared with non-diabetics, delayed revascularization with PCI in diabetics with acute myocardial infarction has less benefit on the improvement of left ventricular function, and it may be the insufficient reperfusion or reperfusion injury to myocardium but not the viable myocardium contribute to the poor result.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Acute anterior wall myocardial infarction (n=125). Delayed recanalization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Non-diabetic patients (delayed recanalization) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months (p=<0.01). Delayed recanalization with percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction resulted in lower left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months compared to non-diabetic patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: