Key result
The Mindray hs-cTnI assay demonstrated excellent lot-to-lot concordance (bias 0.73%; kappa 0.98) and lower rates of baseline values exceeding the 99th percentile compared to routine methods.
Why the study?
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays are pivotal for ACS diagnosis and accelerated ED algorithms, requiring assessment of the Mindray hs-cTnI assay's analytical and clinical performance, particularly reagent and calibrator lot-to-lot variability.
Does the Mindray hs-cTnI assay demonstrate comparable analytical and clinical performance to routine assays with acceptable lot-to-lot variability in ED patients with suspected myocardial injury?
Observational (n=400)
Yes
Does the Mindray hs-cTnI assay demonstrate comparable analytical and clinical performance to routine assays with acceptable lot-to-lot variability in ED patients with suspected myocardial injury?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Mindray hs-cTnI assay demonstrated robust analytical performance and excellent lot-to-lot stability, supporting its clinical reliability for ED use.
OBJECTIVES: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays are pivotal for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and implementing accelerated rule-in/rule-out algorithms in the emergency department (ED). This study assessed the analytical and clinical performance of the Mindray hs-cTnI chemiluminescent immunoassay in comparison with the assays routinely adopted at the University Hospital of Padova (AOUP; Access, Beckman Coulter) and at Bassano Hospital (ULSS7; Architect, Abbott). Particular attention was given to reagent and calibrator lot-to-lot variability and its potential clinical impact. METHODS: The study included 400 ED patients with suspected myocardial injury (213 at AOUP [P1] and 187 at ULSS7 [P2]), yielding a total of 823 lithium-heparin plasma samples collected at baseline, 2 h, and, when available, at a third time point. Lot-to-lot comparability was examined in 424 samples using two reagent/calibrator lot combinations (R1/C1 and R2/C2) and further explored in 51 additional samples tested with four lot combinations. RESULTS: Within-laboratory imprecision was 2.03 % at 2.45 ng/L and 2.25 % at 4.76 ng/L. Among patients discharged from ED, the proportion of baseline values exceeding the 99th percentile was lower with the Mindray assay (P1: 16.2 %, P2: 15.1 %) compared with routine methods (P1: 26.8 %, P2: 17.8 %). Furthermore, diagnostic agreement was higher with Architect than with Access (Cohen's kappa 0.93 vs. 0.77). Lot-to-lot comparison demonstrated excellent concordance between R1/C1 and R2/C2 (bias 0.73 %; kappa 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated assay demonstrated robust analytical and clinical performance, together with excellent lot-to-lot stability. Nevertheless, ongoing surveillance of reagent and calibrator lot changes remains advisable to ensure sustained analytical consistency and clinical reliability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pangrazzi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in suspected myocardial injury (n=400). Mindray hs-cTnI chemiluminescent immunoassay vs. Access (Beckman Coulter) and Architect (Abbott) assays was evaluated on Baseline values exceeding the 99th percentile among discharged patients at AOUP (P1). The Mindray hs-cTnI assay demonstrated excellent lot-to-lot concordance (bias 0.73%; kappa 0.98) and lower rates of baseline values exceeding the 99th percentile compared to routine methods.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: