Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Questionnaire study examines how values and efficacy beliefs influence pro-environmental actions among employees, suggesting strategies for organisations.
Purpose To achieve organisational pro-environmental goals, it is critical that employees engage in pro-environmental behaviours. This study aims to understand how individual and organisational biospheric values, self-efficacy and collective outcome efficacy are related to in-role pro-environmental behaviours (i.e. designing pro-environmental products or services) and environmental advocacy at work (i.e. encouraging environmental action among others). Design/methodology/approach We conducted a questionnaire study among 304 Dutch employees. Findings As expected, stronger individual and perceived organisational biospheric values were related to higher self-efficacy and collective outcome efficacy, which in turn promoted in-role pro-environmental behaviours and environmental advocacy. Further, particularly self-efficacy mediated the relationship between both types of values and in-role pro-environmental behaviour and advocacy. Interestingly, the pattern of results was similar for both behaviours. We discuss how organisations can leverage these insights to foster pro-environmental action at work. Practical implications We discuss how organisations can leverage these insights to foster pro-environmental action at work. Originality/value We extend previous work by examining both individual and organisational level factors related to pro-environmental behaviour at work. Specifically, we examine to what extent individual and perceived organisational biospheric values explain employees’ in-role pro-environmental behaviour and environmental advocacy, and how self-efficacy and collective outcome efficacy are associated with these relationships. Our findings indicate that both individual and organisational level factors are important to understand employees’ pro-environmental behaviour. We rely on a high-quality sample from an organisation in a sector with high climate impact to test our reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: