Why the study?
Clinical guidelines for diastolic dysfunction were updated in 2016, but their concordance with 2009 criteria and the impact of left ventricular structural abnormalities on reclassification in elderly patients required assessment.
How does the categorization of diastolic dysfunction in elderly patients differ between the 2009 and 2016 echocardiography guidelines?
How does the categorization of diastolic dysfunction in elderly patients differ between the 2009 and 2016 echocardiography guidelines?
Applying the 2016 guidelines significantly lowers the prevalence of diagnosed diastolic dysfunction in elderly patients compared to the 2009 guidelines, largely driven by left ventricular structural abnormalities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution reclassifying elderly patients under 2016 criteria; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Purpose Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is routinely evaluated in echocardiography to support diagnosis, prognostication, and management of heart failure, a condition highly prevalent in elderly patients. Clinical guidelines were published in 2009, and updated in 2016, pursuing to standardize and improve DD categorization. We aimed to assess the concordance of DD between these two documents in an elderly population and to investigate how left ventricular structural abnormalities (LVSA) impact the reclassification. Methods We analyzed the 308 consecutive transthoracic echocardiograms in patients older than 60 years (70.4 ± 7.7 years-old, 59% women) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria out of the 1438 echocardiograms performed in a tertiary hospital. Results The prevalence of DD was lower according to the 2016 criteria (64% vs. 91%; p < 0.001), with 207 (67.2%) patients changing category, indicating poor agreement between the guidelines (kappa = 0.21). There were 188 (61%) patients with LVSA, which drove most of the reclassifications in 2016 Grade I DD cases. The prevalence of elevated filling pressures by Doppler halved in this elderly population using the updated recommendations (20.9% vs. 39.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusions The prevalence of DD was lower applying the 2016 guidelines, with a poor agreement with 2009 guidelines in all DD grades. The role of LVSA in reclassifications was particularly evident in Grade I DD, while Doppler parameters drove reclassifications among the more severe grades. If not properly addressed, these discrepancies may undermine the reliance on DD as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, particularly in an elderly population at a higher risk of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: